Sign In
or Create a new account
Do you agree with all of the areas being banned as outlined in the policy or would you prefer to see only some areas banned?
If you think only some outdoor areas should be smoke-free, then which ones are important to you?
This online discussion forum has concluded. You can still browse the site but the discussion area will no longer accept new comments or votes.
Comment 1 19 Dec 2009, 9:32 PM
I agree with all areas as outlined, but specifically areas where children are exposed to 2nd hand smoke, such as near playgrounds, the beach and pools (especially Black Head pool), as well as confined spaces such as undercover car parks like the CCC.
Comment 2 21 Dec 2009, 11:35 AM
It's a daft idea, no matter how you might like to define areas.
Comment 3 24 Dec 2009, 9:34 AM
I agree that smoking should not take place in sensitive areas eg.enclosed carparks,swimming pools and childrens playgrounds.But I strongly object to a blanket ban on all council outdoor areas.Will council provide "designated areas"for smokers?
Comment 4 6 Jan 2010, 9:30 AM
What will be the cost of signposting all these Council areas and the cost of Rangers patrolling them.
Also agree with Delta Rose about providing Designated areas, how far away from council areas will people have to go to smoke, will they have to also take into account the wind direction so it doesn't blow into those areas?
I agree with no smoking in dining areas, as a partner of a smoker who NEVER smokes where other people are eating - shouldn't other people take some responsibility themselves and think of others comfort NOT be a regulated society.
Comment 4.1 7 Jan 2010, 8:33 AM
Your last sentence says it all, it is the responsibility of individuals to behave properly and with due consideration for others. We should not need draconian rules and regulation to do the right thing.
Comment 4.1.1 15 Jan 2010, 5:13 PM
Sure it's the responsibility of individuals to behave properly etc. unfortunately too many people act with a complete disregard for others. The proposals do NOT ban smoking per se, but seek to ensure that those who wish to use public places without second hand smoke and without cigarette butts are able to do so. Most smokers seem to discard butts without any thought for tidyness, the environment, or those who have to clean up the litter
Comment 5 12 Jan 2010, 1:08 PM
The N.S.W.Parliament has passed a Smoke free environment act prohibiting smoking in enclosed spaces.
It DOES NOT cover outdoor public places.
62% of councils DO NOT have a smoke free policy.
Of those that do,the policy covers CERTAIN council owned and controlled areas.
Nearly two thirds of these councils are high density METROPOLITAN councils.
NO consultation has taken place with affected businesses.
NO evidence has emerged regarding health affects caused by second hand smoke in open spaces.
Comment 6 12 Jan 2010, 1:52 PM
This is a SUGGESTION!
Instead of council spending $4,ooo.oo on NO SMOKING signs,could they consider signs to the effect,
"In consideration of others we ask that you refrain from smoking in this area.Please dispose of butts thoughtfully"
To be posted with the number of quit line and health warnings.
The Greater Taree Council area is not a high density metropoliton area.
Many of us moved to the Manning to escape just such draconian measures.
Comment 7 11 Feb 2010, 10:58 AM
Yes, all the proposed areas should be smokefree. All of them are either crowded, part-enclosed, expose children or people in their workplaces. Council should consider some outdoor designated smoking areas that are set well apart from main thoroughfares, not visible to kids and well signposted.