Seniors Housing
Please use this area to leave your comments on the impact of the draft LEP on Seniors Housing in the Shire.
This online discussion forum has concluded. You can still browse the site but the discussion area will no longer accept new comments or votes.
Relates to
document:
Seniors Housing (32.3 KB)
monty123 Comment 1 31 Dec 2007, 10:08 AM
I'm pleased to see that the LEP closes loopholes allowing development in rural areas under the guise of Aged accommodation. This has been widely abused around the state. However, I am unsure whether this will be effective in preventing the State Government in allowing these factilities with its State Policy? Could you advise please?
Mark Pepping Comment 1.1 Manager Strategic Planning 3 Jan 2008, 3:19 PM
In a Ministerial Press Release from the Minister at the time of the new revised provisions on the State Policy, he is quoted as saying that upon a Council implementing a new template LEP, the State Policy for seniors housing would not apply to the LGA. As we are the first Council to exhibit a State Government template LEP, this suggestion has not been tested. Hopefully full exemption will eventually prevail
Nick Cleary Comment 1.1.1 9 Jan 2008, 11:28 PM
I must disagree Mark. I believe there is a genuine need for the SEPP seniors living policy. I like the fact that you have allowed for seniors living in R2 and R3 however the purpose of allowing development on the urban fringe was to encourage more affordable housing for our ageing population. I agree with making it more stringent so as to restrict a straight strata unit development on Rural land I do believe that we need to make provision for the original purpose of the SEPP 5 and SEPP seniors living that followed. I do question if the new LEP does allow for this??
I must disagree Mark. I believe there is a genuine need for the SEPP seniors living policy. I like the fact that you have allowed for seniors living in R2 and R3 however the purpose of allowing development on the urban fringe was to encourage more affordable housing for our ageing population. I agree
more…Town Planner Comment 1.1.2 16 Jan 2008, 5:20 PM
Mark, I can probably shed a little more light on this matter. I understand that is not the Department of Planning's intention to grant Councils an exemption from the SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) automatically when they implement a new template LEP. Rather the SEPP will continue to apply to land zoned primarily for urban pusposes or land that adjoins such land upon which dwelling-houses, flats, hospitals and special uses are permitted uses or land used for an existing registered club, subject to other provisions of the policy. The Department of Planning Circular PS 07-016 does however indicate that all Councils will have the opportunity to seek exemption from the SEPP if they can adequately justify an exemption by demonstrating within their new principal LEP that seniors housing has been adequately provided for. Mark, could you please advise whether Council has sought such an exemption as part of its LEP process or whether it intends to do so in the future? I note that it is not currently listed under Clause 9(2) of the draft LEP.
Mark, I can probably shed a little more light on this matter. I understand that is not the Department of Planning's intention to grant Councils an exemption from the SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) automatically when they implement a new template LEP. Rather the SEPP will continue
more…oscarthegrouch Comment 2 7 Jan 2008, 8:11 PM
why is everyone so against seniors housing - they need to live somewhere!
Nick Cleary Comment 2.1 9 Jan 2008, 11:29 PM
I agree Oscar. lets just do it in a strategic way. They do contribute to our community in lots of ways.
Mark Pepping Comment 2.2 Manager Strategic Planning 10 Jan 2008, 10:05 AM
The LEP attempts to permit Seniors living housing in locations where the occupants are not going to rely heavily on private transport to service their daily needs. Therefore in established areas is considered the most appropriate. Our other objective is to provide a greater choice of housing sizes in detached and attached forms and allotment sizes which are more attractive to our aging population and which are integrated within the wider community. Many Seniors living developments as segregated from the wider community and do not provide a traditional mix of residents. In recent years some proposals have been made to Councils in NSW which have threatened to tripple the size of a small country village by building on the edge on good agricultural land. This places substantial pressure on local councils to deliver services etc. If you have not seen an example, drive up to Menangle Village in Wollondilly Shire and have a look a what has happened there.
The LEP attempts to permit Seniors living housing in locations where the occupants are not going to rely heavily on private transport to service their daily needs. Therefore in established areas is considered the most appropriate. Our other objective is to provide a greater choice of housing sizes in
more…dadon Comment 3 16 Jan 2008, 9:09 PM
All this provision for old peole's housing seems unnecessary. We already have plenty of old people - its the young people we need to attract!! The plan should allow areas that encourage the sort of mixed development that will attract young professionals with the skills that businesses and our communities need. Letting developers stuff up the landscape with old peoples villages is not a good way to start. I strongly support the B2 and B4 zoned in Mittagong and would like reassurance that there is a strategy in place to meke this work and attract young people and jobs
wscparks Comment 3.1 15 Feb 2008, 8:42 PM
old people places (accommodation) must be in town, and not be isolated,
and do not sell the parks in town either
