Socio economic mixing

by winnie 4:44pm, 25 Mar 2009

It is a fact that your blue collar worker would most likely not want to live in Edgecliff (if he could afford it) likewise a high flying wealth chief executive would not choose to live in the less affluent suburbs of Sydney. Why not? The answer is that they would not be living in an area which would provide them with compatible social contacts and activities. They would prefer to live amongst families of similar social backgrounds. This is not 'snobbery' it is a plain fact. Thus the choice of location in which to dwell is important, otherwise a person or family may feel cut off or like a fish out of water. This gradation of socio economic groups takes place naturally and the boundaries of these groups blend gradually into one another thus ensuring harmonious relations in each naighbourhood. Now to the Normanhurst re-zoning and re-development proposal. The plan is to provide "affordable housing" for the growing population. For "affordable housing" one must read "lower cost housing" which naturally will go to a lower socio economic group. It will not be fair for existing residents nor for those who purchase in the new developments since there will be a very sharp 'boundary' between two differing socio economic groups. This has historically led to disaffection with life, a feeling of isolation and it all leads to other problems in attempting to resolve these feelings. Mental health, drugs, vandalism and other anti social behaviour are often the way the youth affected deal with their feeling of rejection and isolation. Like adjoining tectonic plates abrading beneath the earth's surface and causing massive earthquakes, so differing socio economic groups placed immediately next to each other will cause comunity problems and we have enough of those already. No government should legislate our mode of living in a free country. Leave that to Robert Mugabe and other notable defenders of democracy.The Hornsby Shire Counil Strategy is a recipe for disaster, the only winners will be the Council (increased rate revenue), The State Government (they can further put off the building of much needed infrastructure) and guess who? The Developers who will make a motza at the expense of local residents. 

This online discussion forum has concluded. You can still browse the site but the discussion area will no longer accept new comments or votes.

Is this issue important to you? Votes: 7
Comments (27) Expand All Replies

Lizo Comment 1 26 Mar 2009, 10:02 AM

Can't agree that affordable housing means that they are going to a lower socio economic group. Young couples are finding it very hard to get on the property ladder because housing is very expensive. As are young families.

I doubt very much that the sort of housing provided will be that much affordable anyway. What are the costs of the units in Waitara?

Is social isolation really the cause of all those problems? Sounds a very simplistic argument to me. Lack of money, eductaional facilities, encouragement, facilities what about those then? Isn't what you are proposing social isolation anyway. Keep them down in the Ghetto?

I suspect there are a lot of blue collar workers living in Normanhurst who may take offence to this argument, and rightly so. I come from a blue collar working family myself. First in my family to attend University. If that attitude was applied to me then I should have stayed in the slums where I belong?

Yes agree the final statement we need infastructure to support the growing population.

And there I was thinking that Australians did not suffer from the same sort of class prejudices that we have in the UK

Can't agree that affordable housing means that they are going to a lower socio economic group. Young couples are finding it very hard to get on the property ladder because housing is very expensive. As are young families.I doubt very much that the sort of housing provided will be that much affordable

  more…

RichardB43 Comment 1.1 28 Mar 2009, 7:38 PM

My mistake. I gave this a no vote. I actually meant a NO vote for the original comment!

bellinid Comment 2 26 Mar 2009, 10:37 AM

That's right! This comment is for the most part very silly and also quite disturbing. We are like tectonic plates and massive tsunamis will happen if we get anywhere near each other????

What century is this? Where are we? This country has grown and thrived by virtue of the very simple fact that it has traditionally provided opportunities for individuals to reach their potential. Even people from humble working class families. Some of our most noted citizens had humble origins such Paul Keating and Justice Michael Kirby.

anyway, so called higher socio economic groups do actually live in more humble areas. People such as doctors and lawyers who work within those communities. I doubt that they would say they feel isolated.

A big problem is the fact that there is not enough done to prevent the problems in the first place and also not enough done to help people when they need help

That's right! This comment is for the most part very silly and also quite disturbing. We are like tectonic plates and massive tsunamis will happen if we get anywhere near each other???? What century is this? Where are we? This country has grown and thrived by virtue of the very simple fact that it has

  more…

Snowman Comment 3 26 Mar 2009, 11:09 AM

This is pretty much a load snobbish garbage.

Leaving that aside for the moment - however difficult that is - affordable housing is about making sure that people who work in and service an area have reasonably opportunity to live in the area; teachers, police, retail workers, cleaners.... the list goes on and on and on. Your wealthy Chief Executive would not have much of a life without someone to mow lawns, clean the house, make them a cup of coffee at the local cafe, maintain the car, keep them safe... and so it goes.

Then there's the issue of older long time residents of an area who are ready to move into a smaller home and don't want to leave the area... do they all move into nursing homes! Australia's aging population is driving this need for change, not some government conspiracy theory.

This is pretty much a load snobbish garbage.Leaving that aside for the moment - however difficult that is - affordable housing is about making sure that people who work in and service an area have reasonably opportunity to live in the area; teachers, police, retail workers, cleaners.... the list goes

  more…

bellinid Comment 3.1 26 Mar 2009, 12:28 PM

The aging population is only driving this to a point. It is only one of the reasons. The main driver for this housing issue is the expected 1 million plus residents that are forecast to want to come to Sydney to live in the next 20 years.

There are actually many older people that do want to move from their area because that area is no longer suitable for them. They don't merely want another smaller house in the same area. Then there is also the fact that many of them do not want to live in units, especially units that have considerable strata fees and other extra costs. A $5-6,000 yearly strata levy would be prohibitive for many retirees on limited income. The density of units proposed will automatically have higher fees than older 3 storey walk up units as they have to maintain mechanical services such as lifts. Also they often come with extra baggage like pools and gyms that also need to be maintained through strata levies. These extras are not generally wanted by the elderly but they are forced to accept them anyway.

I agree though that whoever posted this issue doesn't have a very comprehensive understanding about who affordable housing may target. On the other hand, it has been heard that part of the housing will be Department of Housing housing and that can potentially be a source of concern. This has already been evidenced in Normanhurst. Unfortunately, there will often be a minority that cause trouble and in so doing discredit unfairly many low income people.

The aging population is only driving this to a point. It is only one of the reasons. The main driver for this housing issue is the expected 1 million plus residents that are forecast to want to come to Sydney to live in the next 20 years.There are actually many older people that do want to move from

  more…

RichardB43 Comment 3.1.1 28 Mar 2009, 7:37 PM

Public housing is needed in all areas.

But don't build huge areas of public housing. Just scatter public housing amongst the private properties, and we can all live together without ending up with some ghettoes and no-go areas.

Lizo Comment 4 27 Mar 2009, 9:24 AM

Actually this sounds like the sort of rubbish that the aparthaid system in Zimbabwe before Mugabe (not that I'm arguing any sort of case for Mugabe) and South Africa might have spouted only applied to blue collar workers.

"Let's bus the workers in, but keep them in the Ghetto, where they are happy"

Watch it we are then but a few steps away from racial and religious segragation.

RichardB43 Comment 5 28 Mar 2009, 7:34 PM

Overall, there should be more gradutation in the mix planned. Too much is planned for high rise, next to standard housing. There should be much more use of townhouses/villas, to give a low maintenance, affordable type of housing. The high rise should be limited to a few key transport and commercial centres.

I live in Asquith, and I would vote for a high rise redevelopment there, as it is the only hope for the complete dump that Asquith shops have become. Plus teh good train service Asquith house, which relates tothe two high schools there. Plus we have a heap of churches, primary schoools etc.

But between the high rise and the standard housing should be town houses.

Overall, there should be more gradutation in the mix planned. Too much is planned for high rise, next to standard housing. There should be much more use of townhouses/villas, to give a low maintenance, affordable type of housing. The high rise should be limited to a few key transport and commercial centres.

  more…

bellinid Comment 5.1 28 Mar 2009, 8:54 PM

Richard your comments are very sensible. Nowhere in any of the precincts is there a graduation in the density of the housing precincts.

mooy Comment 5.2 2 Apr 2009, 4:57 PM

You should remember the better the shopping centre the more calls for development. You have to answer the question, what do you want from a redeveloped centre, another mobile phone, dress shop or computer gaming shop? As far as I am concerned they can leave the centre as it is, the alternative would be to hard to live with. A new redeveloped centre would attract more people, more traffic. So lets be very careful of what we want for Asquith. Sure the place should be tidied up, but right now I can get everything I need from the centre and still find plenty of parking. If we were to get a new shopping centre we would also get new high rise and all the problems associated with that type of development.

Don't think for one minute that the new centre would be for the exclusive use of Asquith residents only.

You should remember the better the shopping centre the more calls for development. You have to answer the question, what do you want from a redeveloped centre, another mobile phone, dress shop or computer gaming shop? As far as I am concerned they can leave the centre as it is, the alternative would

  more…

bwd Comment 5.2.1 2 Apr 2009, 8:42 PM

Hi soul mate,

I do 98% of my shopping in Asquith and can’t find a reason to complain about the offered merchandise. Only under duress do I venture into Hornsby for the things I am unable to buy in Asquith. I prefer the personal and friendly service in the shops to the anonymity and crowds in Westfield shopping centre.

RichardB43 Comment 5.2.1.1 25 May 2009, 10:01 PM

I guess it depends if you are happy to see Asquith shopping centre continue to slowly decay, and hence the suburb around it.

If the shopping centre remains looking run down, guess what kind of residents will probaly predominate in the nearby new high rise.

On the other hand, if the centre is redeveloped, offering some variety of appropriate local shops, plus perhaps a library branch, a community centre etc, then it could attract a more acceptable level of new residents in the new high rises.

Given that I think the new high rises are inevitable for Asquith, my main interest is in seeing the shopping centre dragged up from the depths it has sunk to.

If you somehow think that holding back the redevelopment of the shopping centre will somehow hold the high rise blocks at bay, then you are inevitably settloing for a lower standard of housing and facilities, not just a run down shopping centre, but a run down suburb too.

I guess it depends if you are happy to see Asquith shopping centre continue to slowly decay, and hence the suburb around it. If the shopping centre remains looking run down, guess what kind of residents will probaly predominate in the nearby new high rise. On the other hand, if the centre is redeveloped,

  more…

AJS2 Comment 6 22 Apr 2009, 9:24 PM

I don't belive that social engineering should be within the remit of local or state government.

Market forces should determine what housing costs, end of story. Anything else is simply messing around with other peoples' money to support pet projects or preferred sections of society.

If people feel so strongly about "affordable housing" then perhaps they should start a charity to support it rather than hitting the overburdened taxpayer - ie put their own money where their beliefs are.

RichardB43 Comment 6.1 25 May 2009, 10:05 PM

I believe that what is being proposed is "Let Market Forces decide". They are removing the current artificial restrictions of limited zoning, and opening up those blocks to be developed as high rise, if the market will pay for it.

Or are you looking for us to start a charity for us to support the poor, downtrodden people of Normanhurst, as a preferred section of society to be protected from market forces ?

MD21 Comment 7 16 May 2009, 8:55 PM

it is hard to say this is not snobbery, however yes there is truth in this comment. however in this case, it is very hard to define the socio-economic status of Hornsby it self, it seems to be very much a mix. However, further reinforced by census statistics normanhurst is a suburb in which 70% + are from an English speaking background, where as in Hornsby it is around 50%, my point is.. if there are to be units in Normanhurst, a large ammount of the new residents will be from non English speaking backgrounds, and is it fair for them to be exposed to a community which is very much Australia, in comparisson to that of Hornsby and Waitara in which migrants are thriving, of course we can expand this migrant community into Normanhurst, but i do believe the village atmosphere it already has, will have a negative impact on the assimilation of the new residents.

I am completley for the social welfare of migrants, I am just unsure if Normanhurst is able to cater to these people.

it is hard to say this is not snobbery, however yes there is truth in this comment. however in this case, it is very hard to define the socio-economic status of Hornsby it self, it seems to be very much a mix. However, further reinforced by census statistics normanhurst is a suburb in which 70% + are

  more…

bellinid Comment 7.1 17 May 2009, 3:44 PM

Well firstly I must say one thing. I presume you are of English speaking background but correct me if I am wrong. If indeed you are then I suggest to you that you learn to spell and write English correctly.

Secondly, I live in Normanhurst. I am not of English speaking background and am a migrant, though having lived here most of my life. I am also very competent in speaking and writing in English. I do not consider myself a dinky-di aussie but rather someone who is very much a part of the wider multicultural community that has shaped modern Australia.

I think that Normanhurst well represents the diversity of modern Australia and the way that people of different nationalities can happily coexist.

I really cannot comprehend how Normanhurst would have a negative impact on the assimilation of new migrants. Are you suggesting that the locals are racist? Are you suggesting that migrants have to be kept separate in their own segregated compound until they are "Australianised" (whatever that means)enough to be released?

Do you actually mean to say that you don't want non-English speaking migrants in Normanhurst? Let's keep it white and Anglo?

Well firstly I must say one thing. I presume you are of English speaking background but correct me if I am wrong. If indeed you are then I suggest to you that you learn to spell and write English correctly.Secondly, I live in Normanhurst. I am not of English speaking background and am a migrant, though

  more…

bellinid Comment 7.1.1 25 May 2009, 6:32 PM

Well isn't it great to see the racist element is alive and kicking and hiding behind the thumbs down vote?

RichardB43 Comment 7.1.1.1 25 May 2009, 10:08 PM

Good to see that you, and Lizo, are being very positive in denouncing the racist message. Even if we disgreed about quite a lot of other matters.

Well done.

Lizo Comment 7.2 25 May 2009, 4:54 PM

Why is it that racist arguments so often revolve around the false premise that "it is not fair on them"? What you mean is it is not fair on you. Don't insult us with your fake 'concerned for the poor migrant' argument. Bringing racism into this fight to stop the development will not get you anywhere.

Cat Comment 8 18 May 2009, 9:58 AM

I moved to Chatswood from Hornsby Shire for 3 years. I gave it a good go as I wanted to be closer to the city. I couldn't wait to return to my beloved Waitara/Hornsby as I felt like a fish out of water in Chatswood.

Ummm, A lot has changed in the Shire during those 3 years...

RichardB43 Comment 8.1 25 May 2009, 10:12 PM

You live in a major global international city that is growing rapidly, with all the benefits and problems that brings. And you are surprised that things change a lot ?????

In the old days we might have suggested you go to Brisbane, or Perth. But guess what. They've changed a lot too.

But really, the vast majority of Hornsby is pretty near just as sleepy as it ever was. Let's not exaggerate the change too much!

Cat Comment 8.1.1 26 May 2009, 8:20 AM

Removed by moderator irrelevant and potentially offensive

Cat Comment 8.1.2 26 May 2009, 9:18 AM

Quite right RichardB43, Waitara/Hornsby needs to align itself with Waterloo/Alexandria or perhaps Oxford Circus London, in keeping up with major Global International City development...

RichardB43 Comment 8.1.2.1 28 May 2009, 2:19 AM

I love the way you "reply", without saying anything.

do you or don't you agree that Sydney is a growing, international, global city, causing things to change ?

do you or don't you think that is a good thing ?

are you really surprised that the change spreads as far as Hornsby and Asquith ?

do you think that ANYONE is likely to be able to stop the change continuing ?

Have you assessed whether you wouldn't be happier living in some sleepier place that is not so likely to be impacted by this change? Why live in Sydney if you don't like it ?

Or do you still consider Hornsby and Asquith somehow not part of Sydney ?

I love the way you "reply", without saying anything.do you or don't you agree that Sydney is a growing, international, global city, causing things to change ?do you or don't you think that is a good thing ?are you really surprised that the change spreads as far as Hornsby and Asquith ?do you think that

  more…

Cat Comment 8.1.2.1.1 31 May 2009, 5:52 PM

Apologies Richard for not submitting a reply to your "satisfaction".

Please note that all participants on this forum reserves the right to answer or not answer anything they wish.

To place a list questions like you have above and expect a person to summit an answer to your liking isn't in line with the democratic nature of this forum.

bellinid Comment 8.1.3 26 May 2009, 9:32 AM

With poor quality development too.

bellinid Comment 8.1.3.1 26 May 2009, 10:08 AM

I meant in Hornsby not Oxford Circus etc